Elizabeth Barrett Browning

TRING: History About Library Contact TRING: Home

Up Biography Poetry Reviews News Reports Miscellanea Site Search



VOL. 36, MAY 1862




1. Poems by Elizabeth Barrett Browning. 5th
    Edition, with Corrections and Additions. 3 vols. 1862.

2. Aurora Leigh: a Poem in Nine Books. 5th Edition.

3. Poems before Congress. 1 vol.

4. Last Poems. 1862. London: Chapman and Hall.

Elizabeth Barrett Browning

IN his Essay upon Joan of Arc, De Quincey thus addresses Woman, not as the general mother, but as the general sister: 'Woman, sister—there are some things which you do not execute as well as your brother, Man; no, nor ever will.  Pardon me, if I doubt whether you will ever produce a great poet from your choirs, or a Mozart, or a Phidias, or a Michael Angelo, or a great philosopher, or a great scholar.'  With perfect fairness might our sister retort that there are many things which she can execute better than her brother.  She might also urge something more to the point, in the fact that woman has done very great things both in art and literature since De Quincey's words were written—the greatest things probably she has ever done.  She has not yet produced her Shakspeare, her Newton, her Bacon, her Handel; and most likely never will.  But what she has done during the last twenty years is quite sufficient to make man look down on her from his intellectual throne with less of the smile of superiority.  In more than one department of literature she has run almost abreast of her brother in the race.  It is very doubtful if the highest and richest nature of woman can ever be unfolded in its home life and wedded relationships, and yet at the same time blossom and bear fruit in art or literature with a similar fulness.  What we mean is, that there is so great a draft made upon woman by other creative works, as to make the chance very small that the general energy shall culminate in the greatest musician, for example.  The nature of woman demands that to perfect it in life which must half lame it for art.   A mother's heart, at its richest, is not likely to get adequate expression in notes and bars, if it were only for the fact that she must be absorbed by other music.  That which makes the mother wealthiest, will at the same time hinder the artist by at least one-half.  Thus a woman-Shakspeare would really have to be doubly as great as the man Shakspeare, for he had not to bear a family with all its precious burdens; nor does it appear that he paid very much attention to his family when it had been borne for him.  So that, if woman should never stand on an equality with her brother at his noblest height, she may fairly plead inequality at starting, and more hindrances by the way.  Great writers are the exception amongst men, and they must be still more so amongst women.  Women, who are happy in all home-ties, and who amply fill the sphere of their love and life, must, in the very nature of things, very seldom become writers.  For most women, the whole of life is uttered in the one word 'love,' the whole world compressed in the one word 'home.'  They live the reality in such fulness, that there is no imperative need to seek refuge in an ideal world.  And then, where is the incentive to sing or write?  Perfect joy does not often set people writing.  Joy is a more unconscious thing than sorrow.   The reason why sorrow has inspired so many singers, is because it appeals so much more to the consciousness.  It turns the eyes more within.  And then it babbles, is more communicative, and loves to ease the heart of its burdens by telling its troubles.  It is also lessened by being shared.   Woman will seldom be able to 'catch up the whole of life, and utter it;' it will generally be only the half of life, and because it is only the half will she often strive to utter it.  Nevertheless, where the nature of woman is drawn or driven to seek expression in art or literature, by all means let her have warm welcome and brotherly cheer.  She has many a tender and vivid revelation to make which is sealed to man.  But her deeper intuitions demand an alliance with the most massive powers, ere the great books will be written of which her nature affords the index.

    In art and literature, woman has no past to speak of.  Never till our time has she come upon the stage so excellently equipped for conquest, and with such a glory of intellectual power.  Since De Quincey wrote his words, we have seen Rosa Bonheur handling her palette and pencil with manly mastery,—a worthy sister of Sir Edwin Landseer himself.  We have had fiery little Charlotte Bronté emerging from those lonely Yorkshire wolds, with the wild Celtic blood working weirdly in her English veins; the magnetic sparkle of uneasy light kindling her eye, and holding the whole nation to listen to every word of her strange, startling story.  The ancient Mariner himself was not more successful.  We have seen George Eliot lay hold of life with a large hand, look at it with a large eye, feel it with a large heart.  We have seen her lifting the film of familiarity, and making the most commonplace lives most interesting.  The low, barren flats of life have been enriched by her humour and quickened by her loving smile, until they have become more fertile than the most highly cultivated plots of literature.  And we have acknowledged that, within novelist limits, she is almost a prose Shakspeare for her knowledge of human nature, and her power in delineating character.  We might enumerate many more of our sister's latter triumphs, but have to speak of perhaps her greatest.  For De Quincey himself would have admitted that in Mrs Browning we have woman's nearest approach to a great poet.  We call her the greatest woman-poet of whom we have any record.  Not a complete and perfect poet by any means; but great in virtue of her noble fire of passion, her in­spired rush of energy, which vitalizes wherever it moves, and the good, true, loving heart that beats through all her works,—thrilling tenderly or heaving mightily.  We often think it would astonish many writers of the past who have been very much over-praised, and who got their fame just in time, if they could see what is being done in our day, and has been done since theirs.  They would be surprised to find what a wealth of delight there was in human life which they left untouched, what depths of sorrow they never sounded, what heights of felicity they never attained, or even saw clear of the mist; what new lands and waste places have been brought into cultivation; what new worlds have been discovered —Australias and Californias of literature, rich in virgin gold.   Not only would they be startled at the new mines opened, but also at the manner of working them.  The closer contact, the clearer observation, and fuller detail, would seem quite as marvellous as the ampler range.  And so, if a poetess like Sappho could but see the wealth of poetry poured forth profusely by Mrs Browning,—see what we demand now-a-days before we apply the name of poet,—see the long years of lonely toil, the slow accumulation of results, the variety and combination of mental powers required,—we can fancy that she would shrink from her own fame.

    The publication of the 'Last Poems' of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, as well as of the fifth edition of her collected poems, affords us the opportunity, or rather seems to lay on us the duty, of attempting a more full delineation of her genius than our pages have yet supplied.  Even should we be tempted to repeat passages which are familiar to many readers, we shall readily be excused, on account of the intrinsic beauty of the poems themselves, and the deeper interest which they derive, both from the growing fame of Mrs Browning, and the mournful fact that her 'Last Poems' have now been given to the world.

    As a poet, she stands among women unrivalled and alone. In passionate tenderness, capaciousness of imagination, freshness of feeling, vigour of thought, wealth of ideas, and loftiness or soul, her poetry stands alone amongst all that has ever been written by women.  Her faults have too often furnished a subject for the critic and criticastor during her lifetime for us to care to dwell upon them, now we have heard the last thrillings of her harp-strings.  They lie on the surface of her works, and have their rootage in the depth of her being, and circumstances of her early life.  A certain disproportion betwixt the matter and the manner at times is one of them.  But it would be very short­sighted to charge her with insincerity, when she uses larger language than the matter may warrant; for the fault lies in the strength of her sincerity striving and struggling with stammering lips, and insufficient mastery of the force within her.  Again, there was some flaw in her musical faculty.  She seems to have had the lyrical impetus, the real leaping of the soul into song, with­out the power of making the words dance to the internal tune.  Her strongest feelings could not fuse the music into sufficient fluency, her most pressing thoughts did not 'voluntary move harmonious numbers.'  This makes many of her noblest lyrics difficult to read, and lessens the enjoyment.

    Her work is always best when she is most restrained by the nature of the subject, or the stress of the measure.  Her great strength, full of starts and ebulliant overflows, moves the more steadily and gracefully in proportion to the weight of responsibility or fetter of form which she carries.  In the 'Portuguese Sonnets,' for example, the fiery spirit is subdued into a softer and more womanly strength.  The great heart heaves more gently, the passionate voice is low with a murmuring tenderness.  In 'Casa Guidi Windows,' the measure does much to keep the straining mental vigour within bounds.  In 'Aurora Leigh,' we see, as it were, all the proud wilfulness and audacity and quick blood of a magnificent girlhood, in which nature is far too strong for the ties of custom or the formalities of art.  Stirred to the depths of her being, and inspired with a purpose, she lashes out in all directions, and her energy exposes all her faults and failings.    The voice is often elevated beyond the musical pitch.  Her mind often flashes out its thoughts in the zig-zag of the lightning, as it were, rather than in the straight line of solar light.  We are frequently more impressed with the display of force than with the amount of work, and feel inclined to say with the Scothwoman to Dr Brown when he put forth so much superfluous strength to 'catch a crab,' and fell backwards in the boat,—'Less pith, and more to the purpose.'  Again, in her prodigal abundance, she sows her seed of thought too thick and too fast,—forgetting that the crop does not so much depend on the quantity sown, as on the proportion that takes root, and that too much brings forth too little: half would have been better than the whole.

    Another fault is that of incongruity.  This undoubtedly arose from her education, and from her spending her early life so much apart.  But many of her apparent incongruities, arising from remote allusions, are increased, if not occasioned, by the reader's not detecting the connection, from not knowing or not remem­bering at the moment the fact that supplies it.  One of her critics, for instance, takes her to task for these lines:—

                                          Never flinch,
But still, unscrupulously epic, catch
Upon the burning lava of a song,
The full-veined, heaving, double-breasted age:
But when the next shall come, the men of that
May touch the impress with reverent hand, and say,
Behold, behold, the paps we all have sucked!

And he cries out against the savage contrast of burning lava and a woman's breast, because in the latter are concentrated the fullest and sweetest ideas of life.  But that was not the side of the metaphor which was uppermost in the writer's mind, or which will flash first in the mind of any one who recalls the lava mould of that beautiful bosom found, if we remember rightly, amongst the ruins of Pompeii.

    Another charge has been brought against Mrs Browning, that her language is at times coarse, and her boldness almost irreve­rent.  The same thing has been urged against Charlotte Bronté.  In both cases the breadth of utterance is the result of unsullied purity of thought and feeling.  Women like these, of free and lofty spirit, who have lived apart from society, are frequently unconscious of that which appeals most to the consciousness of others.  But it should always be remembered, that it is the high privilege of virtue to be able to speak what vice would blush to utter, and to know no shame.  It may be that, in such a matter, we are the furthest from the noblest nature,—not the writers who maintain their prerogative of plain speaking.

    One great defect in Mrs Browning's mental character, which is the parent of many defects in her poetry, is her want of humour.  This is one of the quickest and most clear-sighted of all the faculties, and as keenly alive to the incongruous in ourselves as in the acts of others.  It has the power of enlarging the eye, making the look calm, the head wise, the wisdom ripe.  It is always putting forth kindly feelers, and trying to embrace the whole world in its geniality.  It lubricates dry places, puts a smile into the saddest aspect of things, makes allowance for dis­crepancies, and has a sympathy with the crippled intentions, the arrested developments, the premature failures of life.  What the faculty of humour is worth to a writer, may be seen in George Eliot's works, where it has flowered in such quiet fulness as may not be seen more than once in a century.  This want in Mrs Browning may have been in great measure a matter of the physical health.  If the humour of abundant life with its overflow of animal spirits, could but have run riot for awhile through her veins, it would have effectually cleared her blood of its early sick-room taint.  This brings us naturally to the life which she lived, and out of which she made her poetry.

    The world in general has got its first glimpse of Elizabeth Barrett through Miss Mitford's kind old eyes, that dwelt so lovingly on the young Greek-student girl, living her lonely London life with books for companions, instead of women and men.  We have seen an early poem of hers on 'Mind,' or some such title, printed earlier than the classical period of her studies.  It showed the brain at work before the heart had sent up its inspirations.  It revealed a young poet of such parts, that she needed all that we sum up in the word 'life,' to ripen her nature, and do justice to her great gifts.  Every shoot put forth by her expanding existence ought to have come into contact with such kinds of food as would have assimilated healthily.    These should have been—grasping the human world, and the world of flowers and leaves, beasts and birds.  The sea, it seems, should have sent its salt freshness, the old grey mountains have contributed strength, the green country its sweetnesses, the spring-wind should have given her blood a brighter bloom, the blue heaven and golden sunshine have made her spirits dance within her; and these should have led her out with ruddy cheek, happy light heart, and ready hand, into the companionship of live human beings, all of which might have enriched her nature by giving or receiving.  Instead of this, we hear of the early doom in­doors, the dim life in the sick-room, the mental life kindled and burning at the expense of the physical, the long train of many sufferings, the way of life sad and shadowy to be walked wearily in ill health, and the vista marked across at the end with an early grave. Such was the life and prospect which have been sketched for the young poetess in her early years.  We doubt whether in this case, as in others, the lot was really so bad as our imaginations are apt to colour it, especially when it has been drawn by the imaginations of others.  We have met with people who have assured us that the sisters Bronté by no means lived the dismal life that we had realized; and that, amidst all the loneliness and misery, they often managed to extract a good deal of pleasure from life.  Still there was enough shutting up, in the case of Elizabeth Barrett, to set her mind growing in the world of books when it ought to have been expanding in a world warm with life: the mind was growing, as it were, in a dark cellar, when it should have been shooting and striking root out of doors under the breathing influence of spring.

    The whole tendency of this life was to grow apart from that material which is the very clay in which the poet works.  At any time, the strong imagination has difficulty enough to get fleshed, as we may phrase it, so as to dwell in common human forms, walk in common human footsteps, and speak our common human language.  It is no easy matter to catch Pegasus, and put him into harness.  But when the outer world is mainly closed, and the inner world of consciousness unhealthily quickened and stimulated, the difficulty of bringing the imagination to bear for working purposes is many times greater.  Ordinary men and women grow up naturally in the ordinary forms.  They are moulded to the ordinary condition of things, while the consciousness is awaking gradually.  They seldom feel lost with surprise at the state of matters in which they have grown up.  They do not feel eager to use the stride of a disembodied spirit, and so step forth over this world's boundaries.  They take kindly to the law of gravitation.  They are fitly fleshed, and don't hear the music of the spheres, but are quite content to tread in the everyday track.  If strongly moved by emotion, the soul can find room to palpitate within the senses, and is not for ever trying to flap its wings without, and soar over the heights that hem it round.  There are spirits, however, that seem not to grow up in this natural way, receiving food and growth through the senses. They appear to have dropt on the planet ready made.  They often go wailing round our world, and seek in vain to get in: so they dwell apart, all eyes for the sorrows and wrongs, the scars and rents of humanity; all ears for the cry of pain, that is heard high above the music of pleasure,—low for very happiness—because the voice of misery is shrill.  They see all the more of life's manifold mournfulness, because feeling so little of its joy, that fills so many a life to the brim of felicity.  They only hear the ringing of the empty cup when it is dashed down?  There was something of this in Mrs Browning, and she found many doors into life closed to her during those early years.  This will account for her endeavours to make a world of her own, not being native to ours, which she did with an intrepidity of impulse more daring than man's deliberate valour, or rather with the courage of a child that is not tall enough to apprehend the obstacles which are visible to a loftier vision.

    From various causes, much of our modern subjective mind is in a similar condition to that indicated by Sydney Smith, when he described some small friend of his as having his intellect, improperly exposed.  It does not get sufficiently immersed in matter for ordinary human contact.  The matter is to be found in human life.  The poet must marry that.  His love must be a wedded love, and not a love apart, or it will fail of its rightful issue.  Milton was quite right in holding it necessary that the poet should acquire an insight into all seemly and generous affairs.  Wordsworth, on the other hand, tells us of his feeling so much apart at times, as to be compelled to clasp a tree in order that he might make sure of his own identity.  And we cannot help thinking that it would do many others a world of good to clasp a wife or husband, and an armful of children.  Literature is, or should be, the expression of life; and to reach a full and complete expression, the writer must live the life in its manifold fulness and completeness.  The poet must take this world for better or for worse, and be united to humanity in all its highest, and some of its sorrowfullest relationships.  Mrs Browning commenced far away from our ordinary world of women and men, and her writing was, as a natural result, all too far from our business and our bosoms.  Our main interest in her, as she sits darkly in the shadow of Æschylus, is one of curiosity and wonder.  After marvelling at the course of her studies, we marvel that she should not have brought from them any touch of the Greek statuesqueness of style, the marble calm of its form and finish.  Evidently there was not much affinity of nature to attract, or there would surely have been some Greek likeness in the English poet's art.  The reader must be aerially equipped for travelling in cloudland if he is to follow the poetess through several of her early poems.  The atmosphere of these heights is too rare for common human breathing, and the heights themselves appear too unsubstantial and shadowy to offer any real foothold, if they could be reached. Nevertheless, they show a spacious mind, richly and diversely furnished; aspiration tending heavenward, irresistible as burning flames, and a courage more glorified in failure than much which has stood crowned with the world's success.  She has dared to grapple with such a subject as the Crucifixion, and look on its agony through the eves of seraphs, who saw the sight, and heard the cry that Heaven did not answer.  Of this poem—'the Seraphim'—the poetess speaks thus in her epilogue:—

I, too, may haply smile another day
At the far recollection of this lay,
When God may call me in your midst to dwell,
To hear your most sweet music's miracle,
And see your wondrous faces.   May it be!
For His remembered sake, the Slain on rood,
Who 'rolled His earthly garment' red in blood
(Treading the wine-press), that the weak, like me,
Before His heavenly throne shall walk in white.

    The day for smiling thus has now come for her.

   Very many fine passages might be extracted from the 'Drama of Exile,' and their brilliance would be always warm with heart­heat, their floweriness always fragrant.  The most human thing—and it is most piercing—is where the poor, fallen nature, hav­ing drunk of the bitter cup, and added its clear seeing to the eyes, can forgive Lucifer for very pity, and with such pathos of forgiveness, that he starts back, stung by this unlooked-for revelation!  For Adam is able to see in the clear light of his great grief, that Lucifer has also fallen!  He comprehends by the vast brows, and melancholy eyes, and outlines of faded angelhood, that he must have fallen from heights sublime; and it must have been a mighty fall to his present place.  What darkness of desolation, what blank majesty there is in these lines:—

It seems as if he looked from grief to God,
And could not see Him.

    We must touch upon one or two of Mrs Browning's smaller poems of another period, and pass on to those of a later time.    Here are a few stanzas calmer and more musical than usual, and they linger in the memory, soothing and unforgetable.

Of all the thoughts of God that are
Borne inward unto souls afar,
Along the Psalmist's music deep,
Now tell me if that any is,
For gift or grace, surpassing this,—
"He giveth His beloved sleep?"

What would we give to our beloved?
The hero's heart, to be unmoved,
The poet's star-tuned harp, to sweep,
The patriot's voice to teach and rouse,
The monarch's crown, to light the brows?
He giveth His beloved sleep.

What do we give to our beloved?
A little faith all undisproved,
A little dust to overweep,
And bitter memories to make
The whole earth blasted for our sake.
He giveth His beloved sleep.

"Sleep soft, beloved," we sometimes say,
But have no time to charm away
Sad dreams, that through the eyelids creep.
But never doleful dream again
Shall break the happy slumber, when
He giveth His beloved sleep.

For me, my heart that erst did go
Most like a tired child at a show,
That sees through tears the mummer's leap,
Would now its wearied vision close,
Would child-like on His love repose,
Who giveth His beloved sleep.

And, friends, dear friends, when it shall be
That this low breath is gone from me,
And round my bier ye come to weep,
Let One most loving of you all
Say, "Not a tear must o'er her fall:"
"He giveth His beloved sleep."

    The 'Romance of the Swan's Nest' is naively natural in feel­ing, and exquisitely told.  Little Ellie sits alone musing to herself as she dips her naked feet in the stream that flows musically by.  She knows of a swan's nest among the reeds, but will not tell the secret to any one until the destined lover shall come; and after having done great deeds, and wooed and waited long, he shall kneel at her knee, and to him she will discover the swan's nest among the reeds.  Having settled the matter to her own smiling satisfaction, Little Ellie rises from her dream, and thinks she will just peep in on the eggs, as is her daily habit.  Alas, the eggs are gone, the wild swan has deserted her nest, and rats have gnawed the reeds.  They who can see deep enough may find a subtle allegory in the simplicity of this ballad.

    'Bertha in the Lane' is a favourite with most of Mrs Browning's readers, and it is one of her best minor poems.  It is a page from that red-leaved book of the human heart sacredly inscribed to woman's hidden suffering.  Nothing, perhaps, will more astonish us in the next life than to see revealed the unknown self-sacrifice that has been lived by woman in this life.  Here is an instance which the poet has made known.  The elder of two sisters has been beloved until the lover sees the younger one, when his passion pales for the other, and kindles for her.  The elder sees the change, and at length hears of it unawares. She determines to give place to the younger, and fold the robe of pain lightly about the breaking heart.  She is soon worn and wearied out in the struggle, innocently on her death-bed confesses all to her sister, who has been so innocently happy in her stolen love; but there must be no regret, as there is no reproach.

I had died, dear, all the same;
Life's long joyous jostling game
Is too loud for my meek shame.
I am pale as crocus grows,
    Close beside a rose tree's root;
Whosoe'er would reach the rose,
    Treads the crocus underfoot

There is one last leap of the old love, one flickering forth of the old affection before the life-flame expires for ever.  He might come for a word of parting,—the poor heart listens!—

Are there footsteps at the door?
    Look out quickly. Yea or nay?
Some one might be waiting for
    Some last word that I might say.
Nay! so best, so angels would
Stand off clear from deathly road,
Not to cross the sight of God.

    The poetess is coming nearer home to us, and getting closer to the beating heart of humanity.  Her hold of life is growing larger and surer, and by-and-by she will win a gentle nestling place in the affections of all true and noble lovers with certain sonnets called 'From the Portuguese,' which were not found in the language of Camoens, but in her own womanly heart.

    These Portuguese sonnets contain a very tender history. They are an illuminated leaf in the book of life that was hitherto poor and pale, wanting the warm lights and colours of the vitalest human affection.  Hitherto the writer has lived apart somewhere on the boundary of life, with the wan light of another world whitening her face, and the dusky shadows of the past darkening it as they hovered near.  At times she seemed closer to them than to us, and better fitted to understand them than hold converse with us.  She turned from the banquet prepared sumptuously with life's cates, and wines, and dainties, and put aside the proffered pleasures.  She saw the happy faces, and felt the happy hearts in the ring of merry voices, all the while fearful lest her own pulse should take too large a leap.  She looked and saw that it was good, but turned away murmuring, 'Not for me; not for me.'  The confession of this self-abnegating soul being drawn gradually towards the marriage-feast of noblest minds, all the while pleading its own unworthiness, and glowing into highest beauty with the efforts of modest self-disparagement, is one of the most 'secret, sweet, and precious' things in all poetry.

I thought once how Theocritus had sung
Of the sweet years, the dear and wished-for years,
Who each one in a gracious hand appears
To bear a gift for mortals, old or young:
And, as I mused it in his antique tongue,
I saw in gradual vision, through my tears,
The sweet, sad years, the melancholy years,
Those of my own life, who by turns had flung
A shadow across me.   Straightway I was 'ware,
So weeping, how a mystic shape did move
Behind me, and drew me backward by the hair,
And a voice said in mastery as I strove,
"Guess now who holds thee?"   "Death," I said.   But there
The silver answer rang, "Not Death, but Love."

Although it is Love and not Death that has caught her, the startled spirit urges her unfitness for Love, her familiarity with Death. She still treats it as a mistake.  She pleads her unlike­ness to the wooer.  He is a guest for queens, a singer of poems such as would make the dancers on palace-floors stop to listen to his music, and watch his lips.  Why should he pause at her door, to let his music fall in golden fulness?  The casement is broken, the bats and owls build without the house; there is desolation within.  Such a shadow must not stand in his light.  He must go.  Yet she will remember him in her prayers; and when she beseeches God, He will hear the beloved name, and see within her eyes the 'tears of two.'  But soon there steals a new dawn over the face of things.  To love and be beloved makes a wonderful change in the way of looking at life.  Still, what can she, so poor, give back in return for so rich a love?  Nothing.  No high gifts or graces.  She has nothing to give but love.  Perhaps there is something worthy of acceptation in mere love!  For when she murmurs to herself the simple words, 'I love thee,' she stands transfigured, and feels glorified; and the flush rises up from breast to brow with a ruby large enough for others to see that it is the very impression made by Love's signet-ring.  Then comes this surprise of thought:—

Beloved, my Beloved, when I think
That thou wast in the world a year ago,
What time I sat alone here in the snow,
And saw no footprint, heard the silence sink
No moment at thy voice . . . but, link by link,
Went counting all my chains, as if that so
They never could fall off at any blow
Struck by thy possible hand. . . .   Why thus I drink
Of life's great cup of wonder!   Wonderful,
Never to feel thee thrill the day or night
With personal act or speech,—nor ever cull
Some prescience of thee with the blossoms white
Thou sawest growing!   Atheists are dull
Who cannot guess God's presence out of sight.

    We feel it almost sacrilege to go on summarizing these sonnets, for they have the fairy fineness of the gossamer, the delicacy of dew all a-tremble, in their loving delineation of tender minutiæ, such as love delights to pore over.

I marvelled, my Beloved, when I read
Thy thought so in the letter, I am thine—
But . . . so much to thee?   Can I pour thy wine
While my hands tremble?   Then my soul, instead
Of dreams of death, resumes life's lower range.
I yield the grave for thy sake, and exchange
My near sweet view of heaven for earth and thee.

    The growth of a new interest in life and this world is beautifully told.  We are made to feel how the fresh tendrils that love puts forth twine about the soul, and hold it to earth.  It is drawn towards a closer nestling-place irresistibly, as the heart of the mother-bird is drawn down into the nest full of new life.  And from thence it looks on the vast cold expanse around, and shrinks from the unknown region into which its aspirations once soared.

                                                Let us stay 
Rather on earth, Beloved, where the unfit
Contrarious moods of men recoil away
And isolate pure spirits, and permit
A place to stand and love in for a day,
With darkness and the death-hour rounding it.

    With what subtle, sweet casuistry she gradually convinces herself, at the same time informing us with much delightful simplicity that men are more than the visions with which she once lived, and that the gifts of God put our best dreams to shame!  And then how naturally this leaning together of two hearts, until two persons touch, begets a desire of being together, and this, again, brings forth the longing for keeping together.  The happy companionship of two makes the loneliness of one all the more lonely!

                                         Ah, keep near and close,
Thou dove-like help! and, when my fears would rise,
With thy broad heart serenely interpose.

    The reader will easily surmise that we are now pretty close to the church door, and will feel too reverent to set foot in the sanctuary.  But, after our eyes are veiled to the vision of mar­riage life, the closing confession is still heard; and this was the full meaning of the heart's emphatic 'I will,' when the knees bent at the altar with the great weight of its love.

How do I love thee?   Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth, and breadth, and height
My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight
For the ends of being and ideal grace.
I love thee to the level of every day's
Most quiet need, by sun and candlelight.
I love thee freely, as men strive for Right;
I love thee purely, as they turn from Praise.
I love thee with the passion put to use
In my old griefs and with my childhood's faith.
I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
With my lost saints; I love thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life! and, if God choose,
I shall but love thee better after death.

    We have treated these sonnets personally, and cannot help it. The veil of disguise was always thin, the features were visible and unmistakeable within, and the loving eyes glowed through it.  Mrs Browning is always a personal poet.

    Almost all the great poets of our century have been so.  We cannot here enter upon a consideration of the causes which make the Elizabethan poets dramatic and impersonal, and the Victorian poets subjective and personal.  But Mrs Browning, is remarkably and intensely personal.  She does not sing her song, and present you with it as something apart from herself, finished and sent forth to the world with the artist's love and farewell.  You cannot separate her and her poetry.  She is patent in every line.  Her own nature is felt, her own spirit shines, her own voice pleads through all her poetry.  Not only is this so, but you are obliged, as it were, to be with her in the act of writing.  She does not sing to you in the distance; she writes in your presence.  You see the face flashing white with thought, the eye kindled large with feeling, the hand trembling in its eagerness to scatter round the thick-coming throng of emotions, ideas, and fancies.  Indeed, you hear the very scratching of the hurrying pen on the paper.  The great poets of the objective class do not do thus, and yet there is in it a marvellous charm.  The larger number of readers of poetry prefer this kind of relation­ship, to the personal poet; they can get so much nearer home to the poet nature in this way,—the personality in flesh and blood is so much more powerful with them than the ideal creations of the dramatists.  So that this kind of poets, and poetry, and way of working, has its compensations,—after all that has been said against its narrower limits and lowlier place.

    Mrs Browning, we repeat, is intensely personal.  Her appeals have in them the sharp cry of a woman's voice, at times pierc­ingly pathetic.  She does not solicit our sympathies merely with pen and paper; but the poetess comes herself, and pleads her cause in person. She goes straight to the heart of the matter, and does not stand upon ceremony; right on through many a conventionalism she goes, not careful to walk in the world's ways, or use its favourite phrases.  In that cry of the children, which is only second to Hood's 'Song of the Shirt' in its expostulation with society, there is a striking instance of her piercing personal intensity, where she presents the naked, warm, beating, and bleeding child-heart in the path that so many are treading, and sorrowfully asks if they can trample it under foot.

    All the forming forces about her early life undoubtedly tended to sharpen her mind to this personal point, and it is natural that she should penetrate further, and win her greatest success in this personal way.  Being so little dramatic, having so little will, or wish, or leisure to go out of herself, and enter into the individu­ality of others, she is all the more effective in description.  It is here that she finds neither let nor hindrance, and her genius reaches to its full stature.  We may see this if we go back to the time of 'Duchess May,' and that description of her mounting on horseback in front of her husband for the double death-ride, as though it were some mount of transfiguration, and she shone all over, glorified with the spirit of self-sacrifice, as with a proud smile she lighted the way to their dark bridal.

    Her power in delineating by means of description is equally great, whether she sets before us an angel whose 'eyes were dreadful, for you saw that they saw God,' or she paints the por­trait of 'Dog Flush,' the darling of luxurious fortunes, nursed and petted in the lap of plenty, his two eyes looking out on you, golden-clear, from between the long lazy ears, and every silken hair burnished with soft splendour.

    She could make of her descriptive power almost a new art; a something which quite reversed the old ideas of the word 'descriptive' when applied to poetry, she could crowd so much meaning into so few words.  Take a few of her poet-pictures in illustration:—

Here Homer, with the broad suspense,
Of thundrous brows, and lips intense
Of garrulous god-innocence.

There, Shakspeare, on whose forehead climb
The crowns o' the world. O eyes sublime,
With tears and laughters for all time!

And Schiller with heroic front,
Worthy of Plutarch's kiss upon't,
Too large for wreath of modern wont.

And Chaucer with his infantine,
Familiar clasp of things divine.
That mark upon his lip is wine.

And Burns, with pungent passionings
In his deep eyes.

And Shelley, in his white-ideal,
All statue-blind.

    Or glance for a moment at that wonderful poem, 'Aurora Leigh,' and see how this power runs through it, redeemingly and enrichingly, almost making up for all the want of dramatic aptitude.  What immortal touches it lavishes, and what things to think over it supplies! To mention only a few at random.   Who can ever forget that description of the nestled babe in its little soft bed, warm and ruddy with life, the tiny 'holdfast hands' which had closed on the mother's finger as it went to sleep, and 'kept the mould of it;' and the blue eyes slowly opening wide on its mother.  Or the descriptions of Lady Waldemar, the beautiful woman-serpent brightening with some new glory of colour, and enfolding some fresh grace of form with every deadly motion, which show us that the devil never stole on mankind more caressingly, or was more cleverly detected and portrayed.  The sketch of Lord Howe, too long for us to quote, is perfect. So is that hint of Sir Blaise:—

Good Sir' Blaise's brow is high,
And noticeably narrow; a strong wind
You fancy might unroof him suddenly,
And blow that great top attic off his head,
So piled with feudal relics.

The description of Marian Earle driven forth—

The swine's road, headlong o'er a precipice,
In such a curl of hell-foam caught and choked.

and of poor blind Romney, as he stands pale in the moonlight, stretching out his arms towards the 'solemn, thrilling, proud, pathetic voice' of Marian.  Here the passion goes right to the heart-roots and shakes the tears down by storm, from those who are not lightly moved.

    Before writing 'Aurora Leigh,' Mrs Browning had done far more in poetry than any other woman living or dead.  In that poem, she set herself to do what no man in our time has at­tempted: that is, to recover the lost ground which the poets have given up to the novelists.  Many of our living writers of romance would, if they had lived in the Elizabethan era, have written dramas in verse, instead of prose novels in three volumes.  The novel, however, seems now to lord it over the whole world of incident, and, up to the time of 'Aurora Leigh' at least, appeared to be pushing the poet out of the world, or rather, was shutting him up closer day by day in his own narrow subjective world, until he was somewhat like the criminal, the walls of whose prison closed in on him hour by hour.

    In 'Aurora Leigh,' Mrs Browning has made a most plucky effort to break from this prison-house of poetry, and enlarge the boundaries of the poet's outer world.  To our thinking, she has completely succeeded in competing with the novelist.  She has given a narrative-interest to her work which carries the reader along eagerly to the end; at the same time she has scattered such a profusion of thought, and such a wealth of fancies, by the way, that you may go back again and back again for ever, and not gather up all the good things.  If the writer could have put forth as much strength of art in repression as there is fervour of nature in ebulliance, if her force had only been rounded with Tennyson's finish,—' Aurora Leigh' would have been by far the greatest poem yet written in our century.  Greatest it is in virtue of its immense riches of poetry, and in the power which it shows of clothing with immortality the spirit of our time.  But it was not evolved and finished with that pondering patience whereby the master artists have reached their perfectness.  There was not time enough for such an amount of matter to acquire the highest shape.  We admit that 'Aurora Leigh' often has the look of much of our nineteenth century work, and seems lettered with 'our time,' rather than for all times.  It not only reflects the life and thought of our century in manifold aspects, but the work also mirrors the feverish haste, the conflict of opposite elements, and all the perplexities and difficulties out of which we are to escape, it seems, if we will only hurry on fast enough.  We are speaking of the building from the outside. There is rich and rare work within. There is length, and breadth, and height; looks of grandeur to 'threaten the profane,' and dainty filagree to charm the fastidious; while so numerous are the golden lights of imagination, that it seems to be one great flame of beauty!

    There is pretty sure to be something in a work like 'Aurora Leigh,' which will not be rightly judged by the time in which it is written; we mean in the relationship of material supplied by that time to artistic purposes.  A similar difficulty to that which the sculptor meets with in arraying his marble in the dress of to-day, will have to be faced by the poet who shall try to do what Mrs Browning has done.  The purists will cry out on much as being totally unfit for poetry; the lovers of high art will exclaim against the introduction of that which they con­sider so low.  This is a matter not to be settled these hundred years, and then we fancy readers will often be thankful for many things which the critics of our time condemned as unworthy.  Especially will this be so with much that they have objected to in Tennyson's 'Maude,' and Mrs Browning's 'Aurora Leigh.'

    The great failure, artistically speaking, of the latter poem, is in the author's almost passionately frantic endeavour to clutch at the utmost reality.  Now, we ourselves are pre-Raphaelite in our reach after reality; that is, we look upon reality as the better name for the highest ideal, because it puts the seekers on a surer road, and in a truer attitude.  But we do not ask that the realists in painting or poetry shall show themselves to us with the muscles all starting, and the forehead sweating in the strain after it.  We must not have the endeavour painfully thrust on us, that should be hidden in the art.  The reality should be reached as a matter of course.  The minutiæ, the slow step by step, and touch by touch, of a loving and patient spirit, should all be concealed.  It is for the critical mind to expound and insist, to take the skeleton in pieces and put it together again for our edification; it is for the artist to clothe the skeleton with flesh and blood, and make it live.

    There is nothing conscious or prepense in the realism of Shak­speare.  He can work with infinite detail, and reach reality where never man did; but he does not set about doing it as though he said, ' Now, see what a realist I am going to be.'  All is natural, and like the working of natural forces without personal effort.  He is so perfectly en rapport with his work, that his mastery over it seems as natural as play.  Of course, this power could only be thus perfect in one whose familiarity with all forms of humanity was so great, that he could put on purple in its palaces of stately passion, or creep on hands and knees to peer into its dim caves of crime.  Mrs Browning is so much in earnest, that she cannot hide her efforts to grasp at reality.  She comes to her work of 'Aurora Leigh' with a great flush and tumult of new life in her, and a stronger grasp of this world.  She has not chosen a subject, as Tennyson does, to mould into perfect shape through years and years of calm and patient toil.  A purpose has seized her soul, and she must follow it.  She is tremendously in earnest, and she will be utterly real on low ground as well as high, on commonplace subjects as well as on rare.  And so she goes at her work with brimmed eyes, and hurrying lips, and beating heart.  On, on she goes, with great bursts of feeling and gushes of thought, that follow one another with a spontaneity that is always surprising, often startling, and sometimes savage.   Look not for the calm and finish of a Greek statue from such an attitude of mind, and such a woman's work.  It is not a statue, for it is shaped out of human flesh and blood.  You see the heart heave within a form vital from top to toe: there is fire in the eyes, breath between the lips, the red of life on the cheek; it is warm with passion, and welling with poetry, in the double-breasted bounteousness of a large nature and a liberal heart.

    These 'Last Poems' of Mrs Browning bring us to ground that we have not yet touched on here—her love for Italy, her record of personal impressions received in that land, and her many cries for its deliverance.  We need not now go back to 'Casa Guidi Windows;' and we have little to say of the 'Poems before Congress,' save that we think she saw the deliverer with other eves than ours, as he came over the Alps in the great dawn of deliverance, arrayed in splendours not his own, and inspired with other motives than his admirers at the time saw.   One thing we have to acknowledge, here as elsewhere, is the courage with which she never hesitates to lift up her voice for what she considers the right.  She is instant in season and out of season.  Politics do not improve her temper, artistically speaking.  They are not calculated to calm such a throbbing heart as hers.  They will not bring forth any such quaint music as that from the song of a tree spirit in the' Drama of Exile,' who thus rocks the listening sense as on one of her own swinging branches—

The Divine impulsion cleaves
In dim movements to the leaves,
Dropt and lifted, dropt and lifted,
In the sunlight greenly sifted,
In the sunlight and the moonlight,
Greenly sifted through the trees.
Ever wave the Eden trees,
In the nightlight and the noonlight,
With a ruffling of green branches,
Shaded off to resonances,
Never stirred by rain or breeze.

    They will not call up in all its delicate loveliness and pure splendour any more such graceful fancies as this:—

So, young muser, I sat listening
To my fancy's wildest word;
On a sudden through the glistening
Leaves around, a little stirred,

Came a sound, a sense of music, which was rather felt than heard.

Softly, finely, it unwound me,
From the world it shut me in,
Like a fountain falling round me,
Which, with silver waters thin,

Holds a little marble Naiad sitting smilingly within.

Instead, we have such fierce flashes as this, with its lightning like vividness. Anything more full of awful suggestion than the two last lines we do not know:—

Peace, you say?—yes, peace in truth:
But such a peace as the ear can achieve
'Twixt the rifle's click and the rush of the ball,
'Twixt the tiger's spring and the crunch of the tooth,
'Twixt the dying Atheist's negative
And God's face—waiting after all!'

Or such a picture as this of poor Peter, in his present Roman difficulty:—

Peter, Peter, he does not speak;
    He is not as rash as in old Galilee:
Safer a ship, though it toss and leak,
    Than a reeling foot on a rolling sea!
    And he's got to be round in the girth, thinks he.

There are better things in these 'Last Poems' than the poli­tical. The poem 'Mother and Poet' is glowing with noble fire.  Here is one fine natural touch from it.  The speaker is a poetess and a mother, who has two sons dead for Italy:—

What art can a woman be good at?   Oh, vain!
    What art is she good at, but hurting her breast
With the milk-teeth of babes, and a smile at the pain?
    Oh, boys, how you hurt! you were strong as you pressed.
            And I proud by that test.

There is a very touching plea for Ragged Schools, and the children that may be found in our streets:—

In the alleys, in the squares,
    Begging, lying little rebels;
In the noisy thoroughfares,
    Struggling on with piteous trebles.

Wicked children, with peaked chins
    And old foreheads! there are many
With no pleasures except sins;
    Gambling with a stolen penny.

Sickly children that whine low
    To themselves and not their mothers,
From mere habit,—never so
    Hoping help or care from others.

Healthy children, with those blue
    English eyes, fresh from their
Maker, Fierce and ravenous, staring through
    At the brown loaves of the baker.

    We could have wished to quote at length the poem called Lord Walter's Wife.'  In its dramatic fulness and fitness, it is perfect; the changes are exquisitely managed, and full of delight­ful surprise.

    But in taking our farewell of Mrs Browning we rather recur to some of her earlier utterances, which first told us that what­ever deficiency there might be in her power of grasping this world, and embracing the whole round of human life, her anchor was made sure and fast to another world, and she could ride at rest or stem the waves, in full reliance that if her 'bark sank 'twas to another sea.'  The life she lived apart had its compen­sations for her, and she was laying up for the life to come, in that time which we have spoken of, when we might have wished her to have been dwelling more in our common world.  What she then wrote was not sent forth to stir so fiercely in the bosom of the time, but 'calm with abdication.' She could drop from her lips words both calm and wise.   Possibly these things are more to her now than even her later writings, and they touch us more nearly now she is gone.   Amongst other soothing or cheering and heartening things, we call to mind from her true Christian philosophy those utterances in which she tells us how we overstate the ills of life.  Do we weep? then let us thank God that we have no greater grief than we can find tears for.  In tears the grief will arise and depart.  Thank God for grace, ye who only weep.  We are all too apt to do as fretful, restive children do when forbidden out-of-doors: we lean against the window-panes, and sigh until our breath dims the clear glass, and the prospect is confused, and we are doubly shut in,—prisoners to the natural boundaries, and prisoners to the breathings of our own impatience.  The imaginations that were given us to bring heaven down, we use in making the worst of this world.  We walk upon the shadow of hills, and pant like climbers.  We sigh so loud, that we frighten the nightingale from singing.  We take the name of holy grief in vain; for holy it is, because sacred to Him by whose grief came all our good.  We are too ready with our complaints.  Not seeing the meaning that runs through all life's noises, we often murmur, 'Where is the measured music, the certain central tune?' while the angels may be leaning down from their golden thrones to catch it and smile, and whisper, How sweet it is!  We are sent on earth to toil; to wrestle, not to reign; to be patient with our own troubles, and ready to speak a word of cheer to others who suffer.

The least flower with a brimming cup may stand,
And share its dewdrop with another near.

It is this ground we choose for parting, because, if we ever meet again, it will be here.

    The poetess is gone.  Her work is finished, however unfinished the works may be.  Undoubtedly they but faintly shadowed forth the magnificent soul that dwelt awhile in the weak womanly form, as we judge by the efforts she made to get expression for what was labouring within her.  Yet we are grateful for all that has been left to us by this most glorious amongst poetesses, lofty amongst women, and, we doubt not, most blessed among happy spirits.  And we rejoice in the belief that such a soul yet lives to unfold all its forces in other ways, and reach nobler successes than were possible for it here.

Nor blame we death, because he bare
    The use of virtue out of earth,
    Who know transplanted human worth
Will bloom to profit otherwhere.'

And whether we sit summing up the poet's work on earth or silence guard her fame, we know,

That somewhere out of human view,
    Whate'er her hands are set to do,
Is wrought with triumph of acclaim.